Resumo
Purpose: This study investigates how tertiary-level students in the Caribbean use artificial intelligence (AI) tools in academic practices, examining pedagogical and behavioural factors that influence technology acceptance and learning engagement.
Methodology: A convergent mixed-methods design combined survey data (n = 114) with qualitative narratives. The research was guided by the Community of Inquiry (CoI) and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), enabling an integrated analysis of learning perceptions and adoption behaviour.
Findings: Most students reported using AI to clarify complex content (85%) and to generate ideas (78%). Quantitative analysis showed a strong correlation between cognitive presence and perceived learning (ρ = 0.73; p < .001), and teaching presence significantly predicted performance expectancy (β = 0.44; R² = 0.29; p < .001). Qualitative insights revealed AI as a cognitive amplifier and adaptive tutor, while highlighting challenges related to infrastructure, access inequities, ethical concerns, and academic anxiety.
Originality/Value: By integrating CoI and UTAUT in a Global South context, this study provides novel empirical evidence on AI-supported learning in under-resourced environments. It advances theoretical understanding by suggesting model adaptations sensitive to equity, ethics, and cultural dimensions, while offering policy-relevant insights.
Practical Implications: The findings underscore the importance of institutional investment in digital infrastructure, AI literacy, and inclusive governance to ensure equitable and responsible AI adoption in higher education.
Referências
Al Zaidy, A. (2024). The impact of generative AI on student engagement and ethics in higher education. Journal of Information Technology and Creative Arts, 1(1), Article 004. https://doi.org/10.70715/jitcai.2024.v1.i1.004
Alexander, D., Døhl Diouf, L., & Wooding, C. (2025). Artificial intelligence readiness in the Caribbean: An exploratory review. United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). https://caribbean.un.org/en/295561-artificial-intelligence-readiness-caribbean-exploratory-review
Biagini, G. (2025). Towards an AI-literate future: A systematic literature review exploring education, ethics, and applications. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-025-00466-w
Bissessar, C. (2023). To use or not to use ChatGPT and assistive artificial intelligence tools in higher education institutions? The modern-day conundrum—students' and faculty's perspectives. Equity in Education & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/27526461231215083
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/thematic-analysis/book248481
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://study.sagepub.com/creswell3e
Cross, J., Robinson, R., Devaraju, S., Vaughans, A., & Hood, R. (2023). Transforming medical education: Assessing the integration of ChatGPT into faculty workflows at a Caribbean medical school. Cureus, 15(7), e41399. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41399
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2022, 2025). Digital divides and inclusion in the Caribbean “new normal” (Director’s Desk). FOCUS Magazine. https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/48904
Enightoola, K., Fraser, S., & Brunton, T. (2014). Exploring the Community of Inquiry model: Students’ attitudes towards e-learning. Caribbean Teaching Scholar, 4(2), 81–98. https://www.mona.uwi.edu/cop/library/exploring-community-inquiry-model-students%E2%80%99-attitudes-towards-e-learning?
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Haye, K., Cunningham, D., Facey, D., & Ellis, A. (2024). Beyond the horizon: Impact of AI on Jamaican students’ performance. American Journal of Educational Research, 12(12), 825–832. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-12-12-2
Jackman, G.-A., Marshall, I. A., & Singh, R. (2025). Opportunity or threat: Investigating faculty readiness to adopt artificial intelligence in higher education. Caribbean Journal of Education and Development, 1(2), 4–27. https://doi.org/10.46425/cjed1201029055
Julien, G. (2024). How AI impacts inclusive education. Educational Research and Reviews, 19(6), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2024.4404
Nguyen, K. V. (2025). The use of generative AI tools in higher education: Ethical and pedagogical principles. Journal of Academic Ethics, 23(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09607-1
Noroozi, O., Soleimani, S., Farrokhnia, M., & Banihashem, S. K. (2024). Generative AI in education: Pedagogical, theoretical, and methodological perspectives. International Journal of Technology in Education, 7(3), 373–385. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.08666
Pangrazio, L., & Selwyn, N. (2023). Critical data literacies: Rethinking data and everyday life. Learning, Media and Technology, 48(1), 1–13. https://direct.mit.edu/books/monograph/5694/Critical-Data-LiteraciesRethinking-Data-and?
Roberts, L. N., Solomon, F. N., & Cummings, R. (2024). Navigating the AI landscape in Caribbean education. In AI in Education (pp. 268–285). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2728-9.ch012
Schei, O., Mikalef, P., & Krogstie, J. (2024). Cognitive engagement with generative AI: Implications for higher education. Computers & Education, 190, 104731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.104731
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. & Davis, F.D. (2003). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t57185-000.
World Bank. (2025). Artificial intelligence revolution in education: What you need to know. World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099757104152527995/pdf/IDU-b1e5ef00-75ff-4ba4-a4b6-84899c3ea968.pdf
Zhai, X., Chu, X., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S. Y., Istenic, A., Spector, M., Liu, J.-B., Yuan, J., & Li, Y. (2021). A review of artificial intelligence (AI) in education from 2010 to 2020. Complexity, 2021, Article 8812542. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8812542
Zlotnikova, I., Hlomani, H., Mokgetse, T., & Bagai, K. (2025). Establishing ethical standards for GenAI in university education: A roadmap for academic integrity and fairness. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 23(2), 188–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-07-2024-0104

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.