Keywords
Higher Education
Student Attitudes
Ethics and Governance
Learning
How to Cite
Abstract
Purpose: This study examines undergraduate college students’ knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding artificial intelligence (AI), with a particular focus on its use in classroom, coursework, and personal applications. The objective is to provide empirical insights into how students perceive the benefits, risks, and ethical implications of AI adoption in higher education.
Methodology: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 319 students enrolled in a personal wellness elective course in the United States, of whom 258 (81%) completed the questionnaire. Data collection focused on familiarity with AI, frequency and context of use, perceived benefits, ethical concerns, and trust in AI systems. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, Fisher’s exact tests, and ANOVA to examine associations between frequency of AI use and student perceptions.
Findings: More than half of the students reported familiarity with AI, most frequently learning about it through the internet. Frequent AI users expressed higher levels of trust in AI, were more likely to believe that AI makes learning easier, and associated it with improvements in writing, critical thinking, and communication skills. In contrast, infrequent users were more likely to perceive AI use in class as cheating, express distrust in AI safety, and emphasize the need for stricter regulation. Overall, results highlight a “digital divide” between frequent and infrequent users, with implications for teaching practices and institutional policies.
Originality/Contribution: This study contributes to the emerging literature on AI in higher education by offering one of the few empirical analyses of U.S. college students’ perspectives. It advances understanding of the ethical and pedagogical challenges posed by AI integration and provides evidence that can inform the design of institutional policies, curricula, and training programs.
Practical Implications: The findings underscore the urgent need for universities to develop clear policies and training programs on the responsible use of AI. Institutions should promote AI literacy among both students and faculty to address ethical concerns, reduce academic integrity risks, and prepare students for future workforce demands shaped by technological innovation.
Limitations: The study is limited by its cross-sectional design, single-institution sampling frame, and reliance on self-reported data. Future research should expand to multiple universities, adopt longitudinal designs, and explore the perspectives of both students and faculty in greater depth.
Alignment with the SDGs: This research contributes to the advancement of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals, particularly SDG 4 (Quality Education), by addressing the role of AI in shaping educational practices, and SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure), by analyzing how emerging technologies influence higher education. It also supports SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions) by engaging with ethical and regulatory considerations surrounding AI governance in educational contexts.
References
Al-Zahrani, A. M., & Alasmari, T. M. (2024). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on higher education: The dynamics of ethical, social, and educational implications. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 912. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03432-4
AlDhaen, F. (2022). The use of artificial intelligence in higher education – Systematic review. In M. Alaali (Ed.), COVID-19 Challenges to University Information Technology Governance (pp. 269-285). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13351-0_13
Ayanwale, M. A., Sanusi, I. T., Adelana, O. P., Aruleba, K. D., & Oyelere, S. S. (2022). Teachers’ readiness and intention to teach artificial intelligence in schools. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100099. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100099
Berendt, B., Littlejohn, A., & Blakemore, M. (2020). AI in education: Learner choice and fundamental rights. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1786399
Borisov, B., & Stoyanova, T. (2024). Artificial intelligence in higher educaiton: Pros and cons. Science International Journal, 3(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0302001b
Cardona, M. A., Rodriguez, R. J., & Ishmael, K. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the future of teaching and learning. Retrieved October 31 from https://www.ed.gov/sites/ed/files/documents/ai-report/ai-report.pdf
Castillo-Martínez, I. M., Flores-Bueno, D., Gómez-Puente, S. M., & Vite-León, V. O. (2024). Ai in higher education: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1391485
Celik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., & Järvelä, S. (2022). The promises and challenges of artificial intelligence for teachers: A systematic review of research. TechTrends, 66(4), 616-630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y
Cengage Group. (2024). 2024 Graduate Employability Report: Preparing students for the GenAI-driven workplace. Retrieved October 31 from https://cengage.widen.net/s/bmjxxjx9mm/cg-2024-employability-survey-rep
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Chen, N.-S., Yin, C., Isaias, P., & Psotka, J. (2020). Educational big data: Extracting meaning from data for smart education. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(2), 142-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1635395
Coffey, L. (2024). Professors cautious of tools to detect AI-generated writing. Retrieved October 31 from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/tech-innovation/artificial-intelligence/2024/02/09/professors-proceed-caution-using-ai
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Dwyer, M., & Laird, E. (2024). UIp in the air: Educators juggling the potential of generative AI with detection, discipline, and distrust. Retrieved October 31 from https://cdt.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/2024-03-21-CDT-Civic-Tech-Generative-AI-Survey-Research-final.pdf
Edwards, B. (2023). Why AI writing detectors don't work. Retrieved October 31 from https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/07/why-ai-detectors-think-the-us-constitution-was-written-by-ai/
European Parliament. (2023). What is artificial intelligence and how is it used? Retrieved October 31 from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20200827STO85804/what-is-artificial-intelligence-and-how-is-it-used
Fowler, G. A. (2023). We test a new ChatGPT-detector for teachers. It flagged an innocent student. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/04/01/chatgpt-cheating-detection-turnitin/
Ghotbi, N., & Ho, M. T. (2021). Moral awareness of college students regarding artificial intelligence. Asian Bioethics Review, 13(4), 421-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-021-00182-2
Goulart, V. G., Liboni, L. B., & Cezarino, L. O. (2022). Balancing skills in the digital transformation era: The future of jobs and the role of higher education. Industry and Higher Education, 36(2), 118-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222211029796
Hinojo-Lucena, F.-J., Aznar-Díaz, I., Cáceres-Reche, M.-P., & Romero-Rodríguez, J.-M. (2019). Artificial intelligence in higher education: A bibliometric study on its impact in the scientific literature. Education Sciences, 9(1), 51. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/9/1/51
IBM Corp. (2024). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 29.0. In IBM Corp.
Kennedy, B., Tyson, A., & Saks, E. (2023). Public awareness of artificial intelligence in everyday activities. Retrieved October 31 from https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2023/02/15/public-awareness-of-artificial-intelligence-in-everyday-activities/
Labadze, L., Grigolia, M., & Machaidze, L. (2023). Role of AI chatbots in education: systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00426-1
McGrath, C., Cerratto Pargman, T., Juth, N., & Palmgren, P. J. (2023). University teachers' perceptions of responsibility and artificial intelligence in higher education - An experimental philosophical study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100139. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100139
Mowreader, A. (2024). Employers say students need AI skills. What if students don't want them? Retrieved October 31 from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/student-success/life-after-college/2024/10/03/are-ai-skills-key-part-career-preparation
National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE). (2023). Data-driven decision-making in education: How REL work makes a difference. Retrieved October 31 from https://ies.ed.gov/blogs/ncee/post/data-driven-decision-making-in-education-how-rel-work-makes-a
Nestor Maslej, Loredana Fattorini, Raymond Perrault, Vanessa Parli, Anka Reuel, Erik Brynjolfsson, John Etchemendy, Katrina Ligett, Terah Lyons, James Manyika, Juan Carlos Niebles, Yoav Shoham, Russell Wald, & Jack Clark. (2024). The AI Index 2024 Annual Report (AI Index Steering Committee, Institute for Human-Centered AI), https://aiindex.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/HAI_AI-Index-Report-2024.pdf
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2019). Trends shaping education 2019. Retrieved October 31 from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/trends-shaping-education-2019_trends_edu-2019-en
Ouyang, F., Zheng, L., & Jiao, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7893-7925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10925-9
Pearson PLC. (2024). End of semester AI report: More college students say AI is helping them get better grades. Retrieved October 25 from https://plc.pearson.com/en-GB/news-and-insights/news/end-semester-ai-report-more-college-students-say-ai-helping-them-get-better
Popenici, S. A., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8
Rodríguez-Ruiz, J., Marín-López, I., & Espejo-Siles, R. (2024). Is artificial intelligence use related to self-control, self-esteem and self-efficacy among university students? Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12906-6
Ruediger, D., Blankstein, M., & Love, S. (2024). Generative AI and postsecondary instructional practices: Findings from a national survey of instructors Retrieved October 31 from https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.320892
Southworth, J., Migliaccio, K., Glover, J., Glover, J., Reed, D., McCarty, C., Brendemuhl, J., & Thomas, A. (2023). Developing a model for AI across the curriculum: Transforming the higher education landscape via innovation in AI literacy. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100127
Stahl, B. C., Antoniou, J., Ryan, M., Macnish, K., & Jiya, T. (2022). Organisational responses to the ethical issues of artificial intelligence. AI & SOCIETY, 37(1), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01148-6
Stöhr, C., Ou, A. W., & Malmström, H. (2024). Perceptions and usage of AI chatbots among students in higher education across genders, academic levels and fields of study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100259
Surjadi, M. (2024). Colleges race to ready students for the AI workplace. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/us-news/education/colleges-race-to-ready-students-for-the-ai-workplace-cc936e5b
Tatar, C., Jiang, S., Rosé, C. P., & Chao, J. (2024). Exploring teachers’ views and confidence in the integration of an artificial intelligence curriculum into their classrooms: A case study of curricular co-design program. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-024-00404-2
The Kirby Foundation. (2022). A brief history of AI. Retrieved October 31 from https://thefusioneer.com/blog/a-brief-history-of-ai/
U.S. Department of State. (n.d.). Artificial intelligence (AI). Retrieved October 31 from https://www.state.gov/artificial-intelligence
Walton Family Foundation. (2023). Teachers and students embrace ChatCPT for education. Retrieved October 31 from https://www.waltonfamilyfoundation.org/learning/teachers-and-students-embrace-chatgpt-for-education
Wang, H., Dang, A., Wu, Z., & Mac, S. (2024). Generative AI in higher education: Seeing CHATGPT through universities’ policies, resources, and Guidelines. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100326
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.