Keywords
ChatGPT
Teacher-Student Dynamics
Educational Technology
AI Ethics
How to Cite
Abstract
Objective: The study aims to explore the role of ChatGPT as an Artificial Intelligence tool in education, critically evaluate its performance, discuss potential problems for students, and propose enhancements to improve teacher-student relations.
Method: The research utilizes secondary data gathered from various publications, including magazines, books, journals, and websites relevant to the subject. The study focuses on unveiling the impact of ChatGPT on teacher-student dynamics.
Results: ChatGPT offers several advantages in education, including customized learning, constant availability, instant feedback, homework assistance, and support for language learning. It can also enhance engagement and provide consistent quality at a lower cost. However, the study identifies significant drawbacks, such as a lack of emotional intelligence, contextual understanding, and personalization. There are concerns about misinformation, over-reliance on technology, privacy, security, and inadvertent bias reinforcement. To address these issues, the study recommends implementing effective feedback mechanisms, conducting regular security audits, promoting collaborative learning environments, and continuously updating AI models.
Conclusions: While ChatGPT has transformative potential in education, its implementation must be carefully managed to avoid depersonalization and reliance on AI at the expense of human interaction. The study emphasizes the importance of balancing AI with the human touch in education, ensuring ethical guidelines, and promoting digital literacy. A collaborative effort among educators, policymakers, and technologists is crucial for responsible and ethical integration of AI in education.
References
Bansal, A., Garg, V., Jain, P., & Sharma, N. (2021). The new era of marketing strategy. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Emerging New World-ICENW-2021 (pp. 102-109).
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., & Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Firaina, R., & Sulisworo, D. (2023). Exploring the usage of ChatGPT in higher education: Frequency and impact on productivity. Buletin Edukasi Indonesia, 2(01), 39-46.
George, A. S., George, A. H., & Martin, A. G. (2023). ChatGPT and the future of work: A comprehensive analysis of AI's impact on jobs and employment. Partners Universal International Innovation Journal, 1(3), 154-186.
Gujrati, R. (2017). India’s march towards faceless, paperless, cashless economy. International Journal of Commerce and Management Research, 3(6), 73-77.
Gujrati, R., & Uygun, H. (2023). How does AI fit into the management of human resources? Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 4, e4. https://doi.org/10.37497/rev.artif.intell.education.v4i00.4
Ibrahim, H., Asim, R., Zaffar, F., Rahwan, T., & Zaki, Y. (2023). Rethinking homework in the age of artificial intelligence. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 38(2), 24-27. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2023.1234567
Jang, M., & Lukasiewicz, T. (2023). Consistency analysis of ChatGPT. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.06273. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.06273
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Kuchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Gunnemann, S., Hullermeier, E., & Krusche, S. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Art. No. 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Lee, H. (2023). The rise of ChatGPT: Exploring its potential in medical education. Anatomical Sciences Education.
Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: How may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 26-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-03-2023-0037
Mhlanga, D. (2023). Open AI in education, the responsible and ethical use of ChatGPT towards lifelong learning. Education, the Responsible and Ethical Use of ChatGPT Towards Lifelong Learning.
Mizumoto, A., & Eguchi, M. (2023). Exploring the potential of using an AI language model for automated essay scoring. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4373111
Mollick, E. (2022). ChatGPT is a tipping point for AI. Opinion piece. https://www.example.com/chatgpt-tipping-point
Neji, W., Boughattas, N., & Ziadi, F. (2023). Exploring new AI-based technologies to enhance students' motivation. Issues in Informing Science & Information Technology, 20.
Opara, E., Mfon-Ette, T. A., & Aduke, T. C. (2023). ChatGPT for teaching, learning and research: Prospects and challenges. Glob Acad J Humanit Soc Sci, 5.
Othman, A., Dhouib, A., & Nasser Al Jabor, A. (2023, July). Fostering websites accessibility: A case study on the use of the Large Language Models ChatGPT for automatic remediation. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (pp. 707-713). https://doi.org/10.1145/XXXXXX
Panda, S., & Kaur, N. (2023). Exploring the viability of ChatGPT as an alternative to traditional chatbot systems in library and information centers. Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 22-25. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-03-2023-0035
Rane, N. (2023). Role and challenges of ChatGPT and similar generative artificial intelligence in arts and humanities. Available at SSRN 4603208. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4603208
Rozado, D. (2023). The political biases of ChatGPT. Social Sciences, 12(3), 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12030148
Shaikh, S., Yayilgan, S. Y., Klimova, B., & Pikhart, M. (2023). Assessing the usability of ChatGPT for formal English language learning. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(9), 1937-1960. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe130901937
Shidiq, M. (2023, May). The use of artificial intelligence-based ChatGPT and its challenges for the world of education; from the viewpoint of the development of creative writing skills. In Proceeding of International Conference on Education, Society and Humanity (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 353-357). https://doi.org/10.1145/XXXXXX
Silva, A. de O., & Janes, D. dos S. (2020). Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in education: A comprehensive perspective. Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1, e5. https://doi.org/10.37497/rev.artif.intell.education.v1i00.5
Silva, A. de O., & Janes, D. dos S. (2022). The emergence of ChatGPT and its implications for education and academic research in the 21st century. Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 3, e6. https://doi.org/10.37497/rev.artif.intell.educ.v3i00.6
Silva, A. de O., & Janes, D. dos S. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of artificial intelligence in education in a global context. Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 4, e1. https://doi.org/10.37497/rev.artif.intell.education.v4i00.1
Susnjak, T. (2022). ChatGPT: The end of online exam integrity? arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.09292
Wu, X., Duan, R., & Ni, J. (2023). Unveiling security, privacy, and ethical concerns of ChatGPT. Journal of Information and Intelligence.
Yang, C., & Ettinger, A. (2023). Can you follow me? Testing situational understanding in ChatGPT. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.16135. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.16135
Zhang, C. (2022). Current status and outlook of higher education digital transformation in China. Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 3, e2. https://doi.org/10.37497/rev.artif.intell.education.v3i00.2
Pandya, K. T. (2024). The role of artificial intelligence in education 5.0: Opportunities and challenges. SDGs Studies Review, 5(goals), e011. https://doi.org/10.37497/sdgs.v5igoals.11
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.